Marine Warfighting Lab at Quantico Gets $10 Million Boost: 'Top Priority'

A United States congressman and veteran who facilitated a $10 million funding infusion to the U.S. Marine Corps’ Warfighting Lab (MCWL) at Marine Corps Base Quantico knows the importance of the facility, partially because it’s in his own backyard.

Rep. Eugene Vindman, a Democrat and U.S. Army veteran, represents Virginia’s 7th District—the same district where the Warfighting Lab is located. The constituents represented within run the gamut across the national security apparatus, totaling roughly 72,000 military veterans, nearly 20,000 active-duty service members, and at one point around 55,000 federal civil servants prior to cuts made by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Funding passed through the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which authorizes defense policy and programs and involves hundreds of billions of dollars of allocated dollars. Vindman secured the $10 million for the lab while voting for multiple versions of the NDAA in September and December.

“The district is very much in the national security world, and it's a top priority for me,” Vindman told Military.com. “As it relates specifically to this facility, we had a tour and a briefing of the Warfighting Lab. We know the exquisite level of work that it does, that there are senior leaders that come from all around the country to use the facilities of the Warfighting Lab. It’s world class.

“This $10 million grant actually allows us to take it to the next level and sort of optimize the performance of the facility.”

30-Plus Years of Forward Thinking

The Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory was created in 1995 and originally known as the Commandant’s Warfighting Laboratory.

It was bred from a standpoint of improving naval expeditionary capabilities from present and future perspectives. Upon its launch more than 30 years ago, MCWL developed a three-phase, five-year experimentation plan. Those phases were called Hunter Warrior (1995-1997), Urban Warrior (1997-1999), Capable Warrior (1999-2001) and Project Metropolis (1999-2004).

Hunter Warrior examined operations in dispersed, non-contiguous battlespaces similar to those encountered in the Persian Gulf War, concluding with an advanced warfighting experiment at Camp Pendleton, Calif.

Urban Warrior involved experiments on tactics, techniques and procedures in addition to emerging technologies that could be used in urban environments. It is dubbed by the Warfighting Lab as the first live-force experimentation focusing directly on the challenges of urban operations, filling gaps in Marine Corps training and readiness.

Capable Warrior was described as a series of time-phased experiments focusing on over-the-horizon command and control issues, notably the challenges associated with operational maneuver from the sea. Project Metropolis ran concurrently with Capable Warrior.

The lab’s focus in the past 20 years or so has been providing a critical link between operational planning and squad level tactical execution, notably mission-critical projects centered on counter-improvised explosive devices and blast mitigation.

A Career of Service

Vindman, who also serves on the House Armed Services Committee, told Military.com he is privy to the Warfighting Lab’s impact because he’s personally seen and been involved in the upward trajectory of a more diversified military.

National security is sort of one of those areas where it's a no-fail mission. It's an absolute obligation and responsibility that the federal government has to the American people. And I take it very seriously.

Many years before he was elected in 2024, Vindman and his family fled Soviet Ukraine with little money—ending up in New York and culminating in the congressman receiving his ROTC commission as a 2nd Lieutenant in the Army, where he served as an infantry officer and paratrooper including assignments in the 82D Airborne Division and as a company commander.

He then became part of the U.S. Army Judge Advocate Generals (JAG) Corps, where he served as an international law advisor in Iraq and later as a White House National Security Council (NSC) deputy legal advisor. His 25-year career ended with a retirement in 2022, just after he attained the rank of colonel.

“This is highly targeted funding for the Warfighting Lab, which is where they do strategic level war gaming,” he said. “It's a secure facility and senior leaders can come in at the facility to do war games. People can sort of pipe into those war games, run through scenarios that are absolutely critical.

“So, this goes really far beyond impacts to Quantico and even the Marine Corps, but it goes to the entire national security establishment, execution of operational plans and contingencies all throughout the world—and that can be done at the Warfighting Lab. So it's a truly unique, exquisite capability, and I'm proud to have supported it.”

Boosted Defense Budget, Leadership Disagreements

President Donald Trump has publicly stated that he would like to see the current defense budget, hovering around $1 trillion for FY 2026, bumped up to the tune of approximately $500 billion.

Vindman, who like most Democrats doesn’t see eye to eye with this president and administration on many issues, does agree with Trump on this front—to a degree.

I'm a believer that the military budget actually had to increase to be able to respond to the challenges that we're facing. But my biggest problem, and I think many of my colleagues, is the lack of accountability. There is no real plan. There's a headline for the Golden Dome, but no real fleshed out concept.

“And the same thing with a lot of the funding here is that throwing money at a problem is not a solution. We have to be highly targeted. We have to fix acquisitions and procurement. We have to make sure that we're buying the right stuff. And in all of these areas, frankly, I don't have a great deal of confidence in this administration and also in the leadership in the Department of Defense," he added.

He called the current DOD, led by Secretary Pete Hegseth, “the least competent, least capable Department of Defense leadership that this country has ever seen.”

“Their principal qualification is blind obedience and loyalty, and it's not experience, judgment or anything like that,” he added. “So, I have serious concerns about the sort of foreign adventures. The president claimed that he wanted to stop forever wars. Meanwhile, just in 12 months, we've seen operations in Yemen, Nigeria, Iran, Venezuela, Syria.

“It seems to be that he's enamored with the exquisite tool that is the U.S. military that is the most professional, capable, combat tested in the world. But without taking into account that the sort of unchangeable element of war is that there's always fog.”