'Zero' Chance of Military Intervention in Disputed Election Results, Milley Says

FacebookXPinterestEmailEmailEmailShare
Army Gen. Mark Milley addresses the Congressional Staff Breakfast attended by about 300 military legislative assistants at the 2016 AUSA Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2016. (U.S. Army National Guard photo/Sgt. 1st Class Jim Greenhill)
Army Gen. Mark Milley addresses the Congressional Staff Breakfast attended by about 300 military legislative assistants at the 2016 AUSA Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2016. (U.S. Army National Guard photo/Sgt. 1st Class Jim Greenhill)

The military is committed to its long apolitical tradition, so there is "zero" chance that troops will be sent into the streets in the event of disputed results in the November presidential election, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley said Monday.

"There's no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of a U.S. election. Zero. There is no role there," he said in an interview with National Public Radio's Steve Inskeep that aired early Monday.

Read Next: Why the USS Cole's Commander Pushed to Keep His Crew Together After Deadly Bombing

"We have established a very long 240-year tradition of an apolitical military that does not get involved in domestic politics," Milley said.

He added that he is confident the courts, Congress and local authorities are prepared to handle a contested election outcome in the race between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden.

"Of all the countries in the world, I think that we are the only one or at least one of the very few that swears an oath of allegiance to an idea that's embedded in a document called the U.S. Constitution," Milley said. "We don't swear an oath of allegiance to an individual, a king, a queen, a president or anything else. We don't swear an oath of allegiance to a country, for that matter. We don't swear an oath of allegiance to a flag, a tribe, a religion or any of that [but rather to a cherished set of ideas]."

The prospect of a disputed election has been brought up repeatedly by Trump, who has questioned the validity of mail-in ballots and suggested that he might not accept the results if he loses.

When asked at a Sept. 23 White House news conference whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses, Trump said, "Well, we're going to have to see what happens. You know that. I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots."

But Milley isn't worried.

"This isn't the first time that someone has suggested that there might be a contested election," he said. "And if there is, it'll be handled appropriately by the courts and by the U.S. Congress."

The nation has responded to disputed elections in the past by adhering to the rule of law, Milley said, "and I'm quite confident that that will be the case this time around, as it has been several times before."

-- Richard Sisk can be reached at Richard.Sisk@Military.com.

Related: Milley Says No Role for Military in Presidential Vote

Story Continues